Biotech reverse merger: Fair to shareholders?

Biotech ethics isn’t all science ethics. This story is about fair treatment of shareholders.

From the San Jose Mercury News: A biotech firm taking a chance on a reverse merger

It is called a reverse merger. And for a failing public biotechnology company, it can represent one last roll of the dice.

The gamble is to merge with a privately held company with better prospects.

The private company takes over the public stock listing and management of the business. The money that the public company had left is then plowed into developing the formerly private company’s products. If those products succeed, the shareholders in the old public company can eventually benefit.

Reverse mergers can be used in other ways, as well. The deal that Merck and Schering-Plough announced last Monday, is being done that way to let Schering sidestep a change-of-control clause in a separate drug partnership it has with Johnson & Johnson.

The reverse mergers in biotechnology are meant to help private companies go public at a time when market conditions have made it virtually impossible for them to pursue conventional initial public offerings….


About Chris MacDonald

I'm a philosopher who teaches at Ryerson University's Ted Rogers School of Management in Toronto, Canada. Most of my scholarly research is on business ethics and healthcare ethics.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Biotech reverse merger: Fair to shareholders?

  1. Nash says:

    It is a must that your company knows and understands the legal procedure and model of the business proposal in order to have the approval from the Security and Exchange Commission.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s